Re: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash
Date: 2022-04-11 16:28:47
Message-ID: 289699.1649694527@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 5:12 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> If this diagnosis is correct, the comment is proved to be paranoid.

> It's sometimes difficult to understand what problems really old code
> comments are worrying about. For example, could they have been
> worrying about bugs in the code? Could they have been worrying about
> manual interference with the pg_wal directory? It's hard to know.

"git blame" can be helpful here, if you trace back to when the comment
was written and then try to find the associated mailing-list discussion.
(That leap can be difficult for commits pre-dating our current
convention of including links in the commit message, but it's usually
not *that* hard to locate contemporaneous discussion.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zheng Li 2022-04-11 16:42:01 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-04-11 16:25:50 Re: SQL/JSON: functions