Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0
Date: 2000-02-29 14:59:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> Well, if I add another field/list to the RangeTblEntry structure to
> hold my working aliases, and if I keep the ref structure as a pristine
> copy of the parameters specified by the user, then everything will go
> back to working as expected. There may be other places in the code
> which really want one or the other of the fields, but as a first cut
> I'll isolate the changes to just the parser directory, more or less.

Sounds like a good plan.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-02-29 15:28:37
Subject: Re: Is anyone working on pg_dump?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-02-29 14:57:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group