Re: equalTupleDescs() ignores ccvalid/ccnoinherit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: equalTupleDescs() ignores ccvalid/ccnoinherit
Date: 2014-03-21 23:27:41
Message-ID: 28937.1395444461@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> Given the minor symptoms in released versions, I lean against a back-patch.

> FWIW, I'd lean toward a back-patch. It's probably not a big deal
> either way, but I have a hard time seeing what risk we're avoiding by
> not back-patching, and it seems potentially confusing to leave
> known-wrong logic floating around in older branches.

I agree with Robert. This is a bug, let's fix it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-03-21 23:36:28 Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Reply-To:
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2014-03-21 23:07:13 Best way to know frequency of column reference?