Re: why do we have rd_istemp?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why do we have rd_istemp?
Date: 2010-04-23 04:46:35
Message-ID: 28900.1271997995@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Given "Relation rel", it looks to me like rel->rd_rel->relistemp will
> always give the same answer as rel->rd_istemp. So why have both?

Might be historical --- relistemp is pretty new.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-04-23 09:24:43 Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-04-23 03:10:25 Re: shared_buffers documentation