Re: Additional message in pg_terminate_backend

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Roman Khapov <rkhapov(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Additional message in pg_terminate_backend
Date: 2025-12-17 11:34:09
Message-ID: 288F67CA-E019-40B6-892F-54B5D000C18D@yandex-team.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 13 Dec 2025, at 12:44, Roman Khapov <rkhapov(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> Recently I started working on patch for adding additional message from admin
> in pg_terminate_backend for one of our greenplum fork. The main idea is that there must be
> done little investigation every time you see 'FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command’ to understand the reason, especially in cases where connection was terminated by another
> user. So it was decided to create some new functions, that allows to terminate connection with
> additional message.

Overall idea seems good to me.
Keep in mind that Postgres literals are translated into many languages. So text ought to be clear enough for translators to build a sentence that precedes termination reason.

>
> I did POC patches with the next main ideas:
> - lets add termReasonStr field in every PGPROC, that field can be used in ProcessInterrupts()
> - implementation of pg_terminate_backend/pg_cancel_backend should be accessible from extensions, so lets move it in pg_terminate_backend_impl/pg_cancel_backend_impl and add definitions for it somewhere
> - write simple extensions, which defines functions like pg_terminate_backend_msg, that sets termReasonStr and calls pg_terminate_backend_impl

First thing that we need to do is to agree on API of the new feature. We do not need core-extension separation for this.
My vote would be for having pg_cancel_backend(reason text)\pg_terminate_backend(reason text) along with parameterless versions.
32 bytes per PGPROC seems reasonable for a "reason". The patch doesn't seem to take care of cleaning "termReasonStr". Is it done elsewhere?
We have a race condition if many backends cancel same backend. Won't they mess each other's reason?

Thanks!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mihail Nikalayeu 2025-12-17 11:35:00 Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2025-12-17 11:10:31 Re: Parallel Apply