Re: Nearing final release?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nearing final release?
Date: 2004-10-18 19:40:36
Message-ID: 28883.1098128436@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com> writes:
> At 2004-10-16 18:41:05 -0400, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
>> I think the cleanest solution is probably to add a state flag indicating
>> whether ParseComplete should generate a PGresult or not.

> Like the appended (incremental) patch?

Not exactly --- the way you've got this set up, a failed PQprepare will
leave a booby trap for the next operation. The flag has got to be reset
on command send, not on receipt of a success response. I'll find a
better place to do it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2004-10-18 20:36:19 Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general]
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-10-18 19:37:43 Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-18 22:03:50 Re: [HACKERS] Final libpq patch?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-18 18:34:30 Re: Final libpq patch?