Re: libpq-fe.h should compile *entirely* standalone

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq-fe.h should compile *entirely* standalone
Date: 2023-03-04 17:12:41
Message-ID: 2885305.1677949961@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 2023-03-03 Fr 13:46, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is actually moving the inclusion-check goalposts quite far,
>> but HEAD seems to pass cleanly, and again we can always adjust later.
>> Any objections?

> LGTM

Pushed, thanks for looking.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Koshakow 2023-03-04 17:29:09 Re: Date-time extraneous fields with reserved keywords
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2023-03-04 16:57:48 Re: zstd compression for pg_dump