Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?
Date: 2021-01-30 16:34:41
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 6:44 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Pointer width is interesting, but really it's a solved problem
>> compared to these.

> What about USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL?

That's an annoyance, sure, but I don't recall many recent bugs
related to violations of that coding rule. As long as you don't
violate the Datum abstraction it's pretty safe.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michail Nikolaev 2021-01-30 17:11:16 Re: Thoughts on "killed tuples" index hint bits support on standby
Previous Message Tom Kincaid 2021-01-30 13:23:11 Re: Key management with tests