| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |
| Date: | 2016-05-25 01:37:44 |
| Message-ID: | 28832.1464140264@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> writes:
> Ok, then I can avoid touching all functions which are only called by
> operator classes, tsearch, pls, fdws, etc. Which also means that there
> is no need to care about Tom's changes to the signatures of GIN and GiST
> support functions.
I think as long as you already did the work, we should keep those updates.
I'm not totally convinced by Alexander's argument that those changes pose
a future hazard, but I'm not convinced he's wrong either. If we're going
to be bumping a lot of contrib module versions anyway, it'd be silly to
take the risk that that's not a problem.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-05-25 01:43:16 | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-25 01:32:46 | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |