Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet(at)amorsen(dot)dk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8
Date: 2006-10-23 21:23:27
Message-ID: 28781.1161638607@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> Right - I think the regression is caused by libc and kernel being built
> with gcc 3.4.6 and the test program being built with gcc 4.1.2.

Why do you think that? The performance of the CRC loop shouldn't depend
at all on either libc or the kernel, because they're not invoked inside
the loop.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Marshall 2006-10-23 21:52:18 Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2006-10-23 21:10:40 Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8