Re: bugs and bug tracking

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8Kdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bugs and bug tracking
Date: 2015-10-13 15:15:01
Message-ID: 28780.1444749301@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2015-10-13 16:21:54 +0200, lvaro Hernndez Tortosa wrote:
>> (50 chars for the commit summary, 72 chars line wrapping)

> -1 - imo 50 chars too often makes the commit summary too unspecific,
> requiring to read much more.

I agree --- I have a hard enough time writing a good summary in 75
characters. 50 would be awful.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jinyu 2015-10-13 15:18:32 Re: Improve the concurency of vacuum full table and select statement on the same relation
Previous Message Álvaro Hernández Tortosa 2015-10-13 14:50:08 Re: bugs and bug tracking