| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: RLS refactoring |
| Date: | 2015-09-15 23:47:31 |
| Message-ID: | 28741.1442360851@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2015-09-15 19:16:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> readfuncs.c doesn't actually stop to verify that the field name in stored
>> rules is what it expects.
> This reminds me: Is there a reason for that? ISTM that adding checks for
> the field names would make error messages about borked stored trees much
> easier to understand?
Dunno, how often have you seen such an error message, and how much would
it help anyway? I'm not sure it'd be worth the code and cycles to check.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-09-16 02:25:09 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add --synchronous option to pg_receivexlog, for more reliable WA |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-09-15 23:44:31 | Re: pgsql: RLS refactoring |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-09-16 00:23:40 | Re: src/test/ssl broken on HEAD |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-09-15 23:44:31 | Re: pgsql: RLS refactoring |