Re: COPY encoding

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COPY encoding
Date: 2008-01-16 21:48:41
Message-ID: 28734.1200520121@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yes, it is. Not sure if it's adequately documented.

> Will this cover the case?

Text looks OK. I think it might fit better a bit further up, adjacent
to the para about DateStyle which is a somewhat comparable
consideration.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-01-16 22:06:34 Re: to_char incompatibility
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-01-16 21:22:33 Re: to_char incompatibility