Re: [BUG?] macOS (Intel) build warnings: "ranlib: file … has no symbols" for aarch64 objects

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] macOS (Intel) build warnings: "ranlib: file … has no symbols" for aarch64 objects
Date: 2026-04-28 13:29:41
Message-ID: 2871418.1777382981@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It'd be a bit unfortunate for those symbols to bleed out into the
> build system, so it seems best to minimize the need for that and do as
> much as possible with just architecture. src/port/meson.build could do
> instead

> if host_cpu == 'x86' or host_cpu == 'x86_64'
> pgport_sources += files(
> 'pg_cpu_x86.c',
> ...etc

This level of refinement is about what I was imagining for the
build systems. Otherwise, if we add any more platform sub-categories
to those files, we'll have to complicate the build systems to match.

I'm not sure if we need to care about suppressing these warnings to
a greater degree than that. My impression is that it won't be an
issue for macOS because of the uniformity of the underlying hardware.

If we do care, a low-tech solution could be to have a dummy symbol
declared in each file, along the lines of

#if HAVE_X86_64_POPCNTQ
// code for popcntq case
#elif HAVE_FROBNITZ
// code for frobnitz case
...
#else
/* prevent linker complaints about empty module */
extern int pg_cpu_x86_dummy_variable;
int pg_cpu_x86_dummy_variable = 0;
#endif

Actually then we'd not need to change the build systems either...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ayush Tiwari 2026-04-28 13:34:52 Re: [PATCH] Fix stale relation close in sequence synchronization
Previous Message vignesh C 2026-04-28 13:18:22 Re: [PATCH] Fix stale relation close in sequence synchronization