Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Tony Simopoulos" <karkalis(at)earthling(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Date: 2000-10-25 15:56:32
Message-ID: 28714.972489392@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

"Tony Simopoulos" <karkalis(at)earthling(dot)net> writes:
> i must have missed something. when did outer join's start working?

They're in current CVS (7.1-to-be). CVS tip is pretty unstable at
the moment with WAL stuff going on, but you could use it as a playpen
installation. Or wait for 7.1 beta, which should be out real soon now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2000-10-25 16:01:03 Re: A rare error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-25 15:50:45 Re: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-25 18:01:57 Re: signals in ODBC?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-25 15:50:45 Re: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects