From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items |
Date: | 1998-10-28 19:16:42 |
Message-ID: | 28707.909602202@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> But we might as well fix it now, because we can't ask for initdb after
> the final release.
> Can someone check that that fix does not affect the regression test
> results? I doubt we do lseg not-equal tests in the regression suite.
> You will have to do an initdb to see the change.
I just rebuilt and initdb'd. Regression test state is the same
as before, except that the new inet test fails:
*** expected/inet.out Tue Oct 27 14:34:02 1998
--- results/inet.out Wed Oct 28 14:02:45 1998
***************
*** 53,66 ****
i as inet, network(i) as "network(inet)" FROM INET_TBL;
eight|cidr |network(cidr)|inet |network(inet)
-----+------------+-------------+----------------+-------------
! |192.168.1/24| 0.1.168.192|192.168.1.226/24| 0.1.168.192
! |192.168.1/24| 0.1.168.192|192.168.1.226 |226.1.168.192
! |10/8 | 0.0.0.10|10.1.2.3/8 | 0.0.0.10
! |10.0.0.0/32 | 0.0.0.10|10.1.2.3/8 | 0.0.0.10
! |10.1.2.3/32 | 3.2.1.10|10.1.2.3 | 3.2.1.10
! |10.1.2/24 | 0.2.1.10|10.1.2.3/24 | 0.2.1.10
! |10.1/16 | 0.0.1.10|10.1.2.3/16 | 0.0.1.10
! |10/8 | 0.0.0.10|10.1.2.3/8 | 0.0.0.10
(8 rows)
QUERY: SELECT '' as eight, c as cidr, masklen(c) as "masklen(cidr)",
--- 53,66 ----
i as inet, network(i) as "network(inet)" FROM INET_TBL;
eight|cidr |network(cidr)|inet |network(inet)
-----+------------+-------------+----------------+-------------
! |192.168.1/24| 192.168.1.0|192.168.1.226/24| 192.168.1.0
! |192.168.1/24| 192.168.1.0|192.168.1.226 |192.168.1.226
! |10/8 | 10.0.0.0|10.1.2.3/8 | 10.0.0.0
! |10.0.0.0/32 | 10.0.0.0|10.1.2.3/8 | 10.0.0.0
! |10.1.2.3/32 | 10.1.2.3|10.1.2.3 | 10.1.2.3
! |10.1.2/24 | 10.1.2.0|10.1.2.3/24 | 10.1.2.0
! |10.1/16 | 10.1.0.0|10.1.2.3/16 | 10.1.0.0
! |10/8 | 10.0.0.0|10.1.2.3/8 | 10.0.0.0
(8 rows)
QUERY: SELECT '' as eight, c as cidr, masklen(c) as "masklen(cidr)",
----------------------
Offhand I would say that it's the "expected" file that is broken.
Shouldn't those octets be coming out in the other order?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-10-28 19:17:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-10-28 17:35:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items |