| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Returning multiple result sets |
| Date: | 2005-11-20 16:29:39 |
| Message-ID: | 28702.1132504179@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> libpq supports it just fine. You do a PQsendQuery() and then as many
> PQgetResult()s as it takes to get back the results. This worked for a
> while AFAIK.
That only works if the caller is prepared to read each result serially,
and not (say) a row at a time in parallel. There are a bunch of
ease-of-use problems as well, such as knowing which resultset is which,
coping with errors detected after the first resultset(s) are sent, etc.
A more realistic way of dealing with multiple resultsets is to deliver
them as named cursor references and allow the client to FETCH
reasonable-sized chunks. We can sort of handle this today, but it's
notationally painful at both the stored-procedure and client ends.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2005-11-20 16:34:25 | Re: Virtual tuple slots versus TOAST: big problem |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-20 16:23:40 | Re: Virtual tuple slots versus TOAST: big problem |