Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: varadic patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: varadic patch
Date: 2008-04-02 15:58:02
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't think the wiki pages should be relying on Bruce's queue at all
>> --- they should just link into the mail archives.

> Except the comments are on my queue, and they are updated to join
> threads by adding comments to patches posted months ago.

Well, as I told you yesterday, I don't see why you're expending large
amounts of effort to create facilities that already exist trivially
if the patch queue was just a bunch of URLs and comment text on a wiki
page.  I feel that your current approach to the patch queue is dead
after this commit fest, so there's little point in putting so much work
into it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-04-02 16:21:04
Subject: CVS rsync service is dropping some files
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-04-02 15:51:33
Subject: Re: varadic patch

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-04-02 16:08:05
Subject: Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken
Previous:From: Chris MarcellinoDate: 2008-04-02 15:55:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] POSIX shared memory support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group