Re: FOUND not set by EXECUTE?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FOUND not set by EXECUTE?
Date: 2006-04-08 21:38:00
Message-ID: 28688.1144532280@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> Note that FOUND is false, but the ROW_COUNT fetched by GET
> DIAGNOSTICS is set to 1. So shouldn't FOUND be true? Or does it just
> not work with EXECUTE and need to be documented as such? Or am I just
> missing something obvious?

It *is* documented: the manual lists the statements that affect FOUND,
and EXECUTE is not among them.

Whether it should be is another question, but that's a definition
disagreement (a/k/a enhancement proposal) not a bug.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-04-08 22:02:46 Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-04-08 20:10:37 Re: Summer of Code -- mentors needed as well