Re: data to json enhancements

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Drawing together various discussions both here and elsewhere (e.g. the
> PostgresOpen hallway track) I propose to work on the following:

> 1. make datum_to_json() honor a type's cast to json if it exists. The
> fallback is to use the type's string representation, as now.
> 2. add a cast hstore -> json (any others needed for core / contrib types ?)
> 3. add a to_json(anyelement) function
> 4. add a new aggregate function json_agg(anyrecord) -> json to simplify
> and make more effecient turning a resultset into json.

> Comments welcome.

ISTM the notion of to_json(anyelement) was already heavily discussed and
had spec-compliance issues ... in fact, weren't you one of the people
complaining? What exactly does #3 mean that is different from the
previous thread?

Also, on reflection I'm not sure about commandeering cast-to-json for
this --- aren't we really casting to "json member" or something like
that? The distinction between a container and its contents seems
important here. With a container type as source, it might be important
to do something different if we're coercing it to a complete JSON
value versus something that will be just one member. I'm handwaving
here because I don't feel like going back to re-read the RFC, but
it seems like something that should be considered carefully before
we lock down an assumption that there can never be a difference.

regards, tom lane