=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dirk_Lutzeb=E4ck?= <lutzeb(at)aeccom(dot)com> writes:
> This was the key to look at: we were missing all indices on table which
> is used heavily and does lots of locking. After recreating the missing
> indices the production system performed normal. No, more excessive
> semop() calls, load way below 1.0, CS over 20.000 very rare, more in
> thousands realm and less.
Hmm ... that's darn interesting. AFAICT the test case I am looking at
for Josh's client has no such SQL-level problem ... but I will go back
and double check ...
regards, tom lane