Re: Review: Patch to compute Max LSN of Data Pages

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama <m(dot)usama(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Patch to compute Max LSN of Data Pages
Date: 2012-12-08 04:14:47
Message-ID: 2853.1354940087@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> writes:
> On Friday, December 07, 2012 7:43 PM Muhammad Usama wrote:
>> Although I am thinking why are you disallowing the absolute path of file. Any particular reason?

> The reason to disallow absolute path is that, we need to test on multiple platforms and to keep the scope little less.

This argument seems to me to be completely nuts. What's wrong with an
absolute path? Wouldn't you have to go out of your way to disallow it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2012-12-08 07:11:06 Re: Minor optimizations in lazy_scan_heap
Previous Message Amit kapila 2012-12-08 02:15:58 Re: Review: Patch to compute Max LSN of Data Pages