Re: conditional dropping of columns/constraints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: conditional dropping of columns/constraints
Date: 2009-05-06 21:43:00
Message-ID: 28529.1241646180@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> As this is my first patch to PG I am happy with most sort of feedback.

Please add your patch to the commit-fest queue here:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFestInProgress

Since we are still busy with 8.4 beta, it's unlikely that anyone will
take a close look until the next commit fest begins. FWIW, I took a
very fast look through the patch and thought it was at least touching
the right places, except I think you missed equalfuncs.c. (It'd be a
good idea to grep for all uses of AlterTableCmd struct to see if you
missed anything else.) I don't have time now to look closer or do any
testing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-05-06 23:04:21 Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-05-06 21:13:27 Re: Patch to fix search_path defencies with pg_bench