From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 |
Date: | 2006-06-12 00:03:22 |
Message-ID: | 28527.1150070602@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I forgot to attach the new file pg_ntclass.h (src/include/catalog).
> Here it is.
Couple thoughts about this:
* I still suggest calling it pg_class_nt not pg_ntclass; that naming
convention seems like it will scale better if there are more
nontransactional "appendage" relations. I'm surprised you didn't
already need to invent pg_database_nt, for instance ... don't
datvacuumxid and datfrozenxid need to be nontransactional?
* The DATA() entries for the bootstrapped relations ought to be
commented as to which rels they belong to (corresponding to the
hardwired TIDs in pg-class.h):
DATA(insert ( 0 0 )); /* pg_type */
etc
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-12 00:27:23 | Re: Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-11 23:54:10 | Re: Extended SERIAL parsing |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-12 00:27:23 | Re: Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-06-11 22:20:22 | The corresponding relminxid patch; try 1 |