Re: ecpg and bison again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ecpg and bison again
Date: 2002-06-18 20:41:57
Message-ID: 28516.1024432917@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> How about we add the preproc.c file generated by bison 1.49 to cvs?
> Could that create problems elsewhere?

Yes. It's a bad idea to put derived files in CVS. For one thing,
CVS will not guarantee that their timestamps are right compared to
the master file.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marek Mosiewicz 2002-06-18 20:50:16 Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port
Previous Message Yuva Chandolu 2002-06-18 19:57:44 Milliseconds problem with PostgreSQL 7.2 jdbc driver (pgjdbc2.jar )