From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving psql's \password command |
Date: | 2021-11-18 00:14:28 |
Message-ID: | 2850852.1637194468@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> writes:
> You are right. I'm not sure what I was thinking. Attached a v3
> with that part removed.
Pushed with a little further tweaking --- mostly, I felt that
explicitly referring to SIGINT in the API names was too
implementation-specific, so I renamed things.
As you mentioned, there are several other simple_prompt() calls
that could usefully be improved. (I think the one in startup.c
may be OK because we've not set up the SIGINT handler yet,
though.) I wondered whether it's worth refactoring some more
to have just one function that sets up the context mechanism.
I was also of two minds about whether to add a context option
to pg_get_line_buf(). I stuck with your choice not to, but
it does look a bit inconsistent.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-11-18 00:17:42 | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2021-11-17 23:46:55 | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |