Re: CP949 for EUC-KR?

Hi, I'm Korean.

CP51949 is EUC-KR correct.
so, that defined code is correct too.

But in Korea, EUC-KR code is not good to use all Korean character.
In recent years, many people in Korea use the CP949 code.
MS Windows codepage also is CP949.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Takahiro Itagaki" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:27 PM
Subject: [HACKERS] CP949 for EUC-KR?

>I heard pg_get_encoding_from_locale() failed in kor locale.
>
> WARNING: could not determine encoding for locale "kor": codeset is "CP949"
>
> I found the following description in the web:
> CP949 is EUC-KR, extended with UHC (Unified Hangul Code).
> http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/libiconv/libiconv-13.2/libiconv/lib/cp949.h
>
> but we define CP51949 for EUC-KR in chklocale.c.
> {PG_EUC_KR, "CP51949"}, /* or 20949 ? */
>
> Which is the compatible codeset with our PG_EUC_KR encoding?
> 949, 51949, or 20949? Should we add (or replace) CP949 for EUC-KR?
>
> Regards,
> ---
> Takahiro Itagaki
> NTT Open Source Software Center
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>