| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Keller <peter(dot)keller(at)bvv(dot)bayern(dot)de> |
| Cc: | postgres <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problems with genetic optimizer |
| Date: | 2000-10-25 15:14:09 |
| Message-ID: | 28501.972486849@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Peter Keller <peter(dot)keller(at)bvv(dot)bayern(dot)de> writes:
> No, I'm sorry, but there is no core file.
You're probably running one of those setups where the postmaster is
started with a ulimit setting that prevents core dumps. You might
want to look into changing that for future debugging purposes.
> query: select * from box_tmp where ebre &&
> ('(470758.555,354028.145),(470758.525
> ,354028.115)'::box);
> ProcessQuery
> /opt/local/DWH/bin/postmaster: reaping dead processes...
> /opt/local/DWH/bin/postmaster: CleanupProc: pid 679 exited with status
> 11
Now that I think about it, are there any NULL entries in box_tmp.ebre?
The box_overlap function, like practically all of the geometric
operators :-(, doesn't defend itself against NULL inputs in 7.0 and
earlier releases. This is fixed for 7.1 but not in a way that could
readily be back-patched into 7.0.*. If there are just specific
operators you need to use with NULL data, you could patch them yourself
in src/backend/utils/adt/geo_ops.c; for instance box_overlap would need
to start out with something like
if (box1 == NULL || box2 == NULL)
return false;
Alternatively, write your queries to avoid invoking && on a NULL, eg
select * from box_tbl where
case when ebre is not null then
ebre && '(470758.555,354028.145),(470758.525,354028.115)'
else false end;
This last is not only ugly but non-indexable, so it's only useful as
a very short-term hack...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-25 15:15:29 | Re: Delete temp tables |
| Previous Message | KuroiNeko | 2000-10-25 14:36:28 | Re: Using pgsql to archive e-mail |