Re: refactoring basebackup.c (zstd workers)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Dipesh Pandit <dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevanladhe(dot)os(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c (zstd workers)
Date: 2022-03-30 20:14:47
Message-ID: 284747.1648671287@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Maybe if I just put that last sentence into the comment it's clear enough?

> Done that way, since I thought it was better to fix the bug than wait
> for more feedback on the wording. We can still adjust the wording, or
> the coding, if it's not clear enough.

FWIW, I thought that explanation was fine, but I was deferring to
Justin who was the one who thought things were unclear.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-03-30 20:22:03 Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-03-30 20:00:39 Re: refactoring basebackup.c (zstd workers)