Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2022-02-14 15:37:52
Message-ID: 2846918.1644853072@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I don't particularly like Chapman's solution, but given that you've
> repeatedly blocked every effort to just apply PGDLLIMPORT markings
> across the board, I'm not sure what the realistic alternative is.

You do realize that I just have one vote in these matters? If I'm
outvoted then so be it. The impression I have though is that a
number of other people don't like the extra notational cruft either.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2022-02-14 15:47:47 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-02-14 15:29:53 Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT