| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments |
| Date: | 2021-06-01 17:46:05 |
| Message-ID: | 2844202.1622569565@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> When this discussion concludes a review of the compatibility sections of
> the create/drop “routine” reference pages would be appreciated.
Good idea, whichever answer we settle on. But it's notable that
the existing text gives no hint that the rules are different
for functions and procedures. That will need work if we leave
the code as it stands.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-01 18:19:01 | Re: join pushdown and issue with foreign update |
| Previous Message | Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) | 2021-06-01 17:44:54 | Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster |