| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Simplify COMMENT and SECURITY LABEL documentation |
| Date: | 2021-06-01 16:25:49 |
| Message-ID: | 2840393.1622564749@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> On 2021-Jun-01, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1 for the concept, but I feel that "live in" is a bit too informal
>> for this context. I'm too caffeine-deprived to instantly come up
>> with le mot juste; but perhaps "exist within" would be an improvement?
> The glossary uses "reside in".
> ...
> I suppose that we should either use the same term that the glossary
> uses, or alternatively fix the glossary to use whatever term we decide
> to use here.
Yeah, having a standard phrasing would be good.
> I do notice now that I used the term "belong to" elsewhere in the
> glossary. That could use some cleanup.
Hmm, I like "belong to" better than these others. Maybe we should
standardize on that?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2021-06-01 19:25:18 | Re: Update maintenance_work_mem/autovacuum_work_mem to reflect the 1GB limitation with VACUUM |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-06-01 15:56:09 | Re: Simplify COMMENT and SECURITY LABEL documentation |