Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Are those exposed through the libpq interface?
>>
>> No, because libpq doesn't really have any concept of prepared statements.
>> It would probably make sense to add some more API to libpq to allow
>> creation and interrogation of prepared statements, but no one's got
>> around to that yet.
> Uh, if libpq doesn't know about it, how is that information accessed?
That's exactly the problem...
regards, tom lane