| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL |
| Date: | 2002-02-20 05:47:41 |
| Message-ID: | 28347.1014184061@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> ... looking at the full headers for recent messages, delays are
> quite small except for those postings that have to be approved ...
The real question is, what about notifications back to the posters
that postings have been delayed for approval?
I know that I get a notification back whenever I'm foolish enough
to use words like "c*nc*l" or "s*bscr*be" in PG-list postings.
But Bruce says he doesn't get any such notification, and Christopher
evidently isn't getting any, and we've seen plenty of past complaints
about postings being silently delayed. I think something's pretty
flaky about the your-mail-has-been-held-for-approval notification.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-02-20 06:13:27 | Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-02-20 05:46:51 | ignore this one ... |