| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 |
| Date: | 2019-04-30 22:24:40 |
| Message-ID: | 28313.1556663080@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I'm not wild to go for a separate TAP test. A separate initdb cycle for
> a a tests that takes about 30ms seems a bit over the top.
Fair enough.
> So I'm
> inclined to either try running it in a serial step on the buildfarm
> (survived a few dozen cycles with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE
> -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, and a few with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS), or
> just remove them alltogether. Or remove it alltogether until we fix
> this. Since you indicated a preference agains the former, I'll remove
> it in a bit until I hear otherwise.
> I'll add it to my todo list to try to fix the concurrency issues for 13.
If you're really expecting to have a go at that during the v13 cycle,
I think we could live without these test cases till then.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-04-30 22:42:36 | Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-04-30 22:22:09 | Re: Calling PrepareTempTablespaces in BufFileCreateTemp |