| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Hollomon <mhh(at)mindspring(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: New relkind for views |
| Date: | 2000-10-17 00:56:17 |
| Message-ID: | 28224.971744177@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Mark Hollomon <mhh(at)mindspring(dot)com> writes:
>>>> I say let them drop it with either one.
>>
>> I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop
>> table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings ... at least you are
>> pretty sure you haven't 'oopsed' in the process :)
> So the vote is now tied. Any other opinions
I vote for the fascist approach (command must agree with actual type
of object). Seems safest. Please make sure the error message is
helpful though, like "Use DROP SEQUENCE to drop a sequence".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-17 00:59:49 | Re: The lightbulb just went on... |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-10-17 00:54:00 | Re: The lightbulb just went on... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-17 03:42:49 | Re: Network Patch to specify IP Address to Bind to |
| Previous Message | Mark Hollomon | 2000-10-17 00:53:01 | Re: Re: New relkind for views |