Re: MacOS X 10.5.1 and compiling for multiple Architectures

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Ruprecht <chris(at)ruprecht(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MacOS X 10.5.1 and compiling for multiple Architectures
Date: 2008-01-03 05:41:05
Message-ID: 28218.1199338865@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Chris Ruprecht <chris(at)ruprecht(dot)org> writes:
> I am trying to build PG 8.3Beta4 for MacOS Leopard.
> It works fine when using the default i386 architecture. However, this
> is not an option as Apple, in their wisdom, have chosen to build
> Apache as a 64-bit application and their PHP 5.2.4 module without PG
> support as a Intel 32, Intel 64, PPC 32 and PPC 64 type module. For
> those that don't know: Under MacOS, it is possible to build
> executables that will run native on multiple architectures, all
> contained in a single file - kind of weird, and pretty bloated.

You're not going to have a lot of luck building PG for those four
architectures from a single build run --- you really need a different
pg_config.h for each case. The specific failure you're seeing seems
to stem from SIZEOF_DATUM not agreeing with sizeof(Datum), but you
can bet your bottom dollar that that's just the tip of the iceberg.

I'd be somewhat interested to see a build approach that supports this,
but I don't want to spend any of my own time on it. I have a vague
suspicion that Apple probably built PHP four separate times and then
melded the executables after the fact.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shane Ambler 2008-01-03 06:27:02 Re: MacOS X 10.5.1 and compiling for multiple Architectures
Previous Message Chris Ruprecht 2008-01-03 04:10:59 MacOS X 10.5.1 and compiling for multiple Architectures