Re: [PATCH] Make ENOSPC not fatal in semaphore creation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mikhail <mp39590(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make ENOSPC not fatal in semaphore creation
Date: 2021-10-22 20:04:40
Message-ID: 2821692.1634933080@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mikhail <mp39590(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 03:43:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Official support or no, we have OpenBSD 5.9 in our buildfarm, so
>> ignoring the case isn't going to fly.

> 5.9 has support for unnamed POSIX semas. Do you think new machine with
> OpenBSD <5.5 (when unnamed POSIX semas were introduced) can appear in
> buildfarm or be used by real customer?

Nah, I misunderstood you to say that 5.9 would also be affected.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-10-22 20:08:01 Re: Inconsistent behavior of pg_dump/pg_restore on DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
Previous Message Mikhail 2021-10-22 19:55:08 Re: [PATCH] Make ENOSPC not fatal in semaphore creation