Re: Future Non-server Windows support???

From: Bill Haught <wlhaught4754323(at)att(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Future Non-server Windows support???
Date: 2019-03-07 20:58:06
Message-ID: 281bc6d4-b96a-fe1a-cdcb-49e5fe242576@att.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 3/7/2019 8:29 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Bill Haught schrieb am 07.03.2019 um 20:41:
>> "...most Windows 95 applications still run fine in Windows 10 -
>> that's 20 years of binary compatibility"  See Major Linux Problems on
>> the Desktop, 2018 edition by Artem S. Tashkinov
>> https://itvision.altervista.org/why.linux.is.not.ready.for.the.desktop.current.html
>>
>>
>> I really wish Linux or Linux plus Darling was a real alternative to
>> Winblows.
>
> On the server, Linux definitely *is* a real alternative to Windows
>
>
> My 0.02€
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>

In the case of servers, I thought it was the other way around. Last I
heard they were neck-and-neck after Linux being overwhelmingly in the
lead for at least something like the first decade of the (at least
"public") Internet.

Like why would anyone choose Winbloz *if* you don't *have* too, I have
no idea.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-03-07 21:04:35 Re: python install location
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2019-03-07 20:29:26 Re: Future Non-server Windows support???