| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | lars(at)greiz-reinsdorf(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Better name for PQsslAttributes() |
| Date: | 2015-11-07 20:17:20 |
| Message-ID: | 28156.1446927440@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
>> The question is, do we want to still change it? It's a new function in
>> 9.5, and we're just about to enter beta, so I guess we could, although
>> there might already be applications out there using it. If we do want to
>> rename it, now is the last chance to do it.
> +0.5 or so to changing it. But if we do, it has to happen before Monday.
Are we doing this (seems like nobody objected), and if so who's going to
make it happen? Time grows short.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2015-11-07 20:23:40 | Re: Need to print the raw_parse_tree in the Log file |
| Previous Message | Lars Kanis | 2015-11-07 20:17:04 | Re: Better name for PQsslAttributes() |