Re: Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans
Date: 2017-04-17 05:24:01
Message-ID: 28144.1492406641@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> FYI, I have this on my to-look-at list, and expect to fix it before Robert
>> returns from vacation.

> Let me know if an initial patch by someone else can be helpful?

Sure, have a go at it. I won't get to this for a day or so ...

> I was not completely sure whether we need to pass any sort of whitelist
> of params for parallel safety, but if you think that is the better way
> to go, I can give it a try.

There's certainly more than one way to do it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-04-17 05:29:56 Re: Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-04-17 05:04:16 Re: Allowing extended stats on foreign and partitioned tables