Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
Cc: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy
Date: 2000-10-17 00:39:56
Message-ID: 28130.971743196@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
>> Sounds like a perfect idea. Good luck. :-)

> Hmm, how much time will be required?
> I integrate WAL right now and have to do significant changes
> in bufmgr...

Don't worry about it, I am not planning to commit that code anytime
soon. (I have other stuff I want to fix in bufmgr, but I can wait
for you to finish WAL first.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-17 00:51:10 Re: fkey + primary key does not work in current
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-17 00:36:26 The lightbulb just went on...