Re: Sigh, my old HPUX box is totally broken by DSM patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sigh, my old HPUX box is totally broken by DSM patch
Date: 2013-10-23 14:51:26
Message-ID: 28045.1382539886@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> selecting dynamic shared memory implementation ... Bad system call(coredump)

> Well, geez. That's obnoxious.

I quite agree :-(. If it were just this old HPUX version, maybe we could
write it off as something we don't care to support anymore. I'm worried
though that there might be other platforms that act this way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-10-23 14:58:09 Re: Using indexes for ORDER BY and PARTITION BY clause in windowing functions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-10-23 14:48:12 Re: Sigh, my old HPUX box is totally broken by DSM patch