Re: Application name patch - v2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Harald Armin Massa" <chef(at)ghum(dot)de>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2
Date: 2009-10-21 14:56:56
Message-ID: 28039.1256137016@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> (or whatever name we choose for this in place of PGAPPNAME.)

FWIW, I would prefer PGAPPNAME to PGAPPLICATIONNAME which is what
Dave has been using in his examples. The latter is too frickin
long, and the double N is a typo threat (I already mistyped it in
composing this message...)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-10-21 15:14:21 Re: Application name patch - v2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-21 14:54:17 Re: \du quite ugly in 8.4