Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS target for docs
Date: 1999-03-20 16:29:55
Message-ID: 28018.921947395@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> writes:
> Is there a CVS target for docs? I don't like the idea to check the whole
> source out just to change ecpg.sgml.

If you're using cvs it's easy to update any particular subtree of the
distribution. You do have to do a "cvs checkout pgsql" to populate the
whole tree once, but you don't have to update all of it frequently if
you don't want to --- just do
cd pgsql/doc
cvs update
to update everything under the doc subdirectory.

I'm not sure that it's real safe to update just part of the src tree
this way, since there are so often related changes in different parts
of the source. But it oughta work just fine for tracking the docs
without the source.

AFAIK, CVSup has no comparable facility.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-03-20 16:48:58 Re: [HACKERS] aggregation memory leak and fix
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-20 13:26:29 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Developers Globe (FINAL)