Re: prepared statements and DBD::Pg

From: "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
To: "Tim Bunce" <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>
Cc: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Tim Bunce" <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, "Andrej" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>, "JP Fletcher" <jpfletch(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: prepared statements and DBD::Pg
Date: 2009-05-08 14:02:29
Message-ID: 27e57524-8461-45bc-b13b-feebfdeba3ce@mm
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tim Bunce wrote:

> So you're okay with breaking previously working, and prefectly valid,
DBI code?

I think the rationale is that such code was working by virtue of how
prepare() was implemented in DBD::Pg, but was not "valid" nonetheless,
as outlined with this example:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-11/msg00339.php

Best regards,
--
Daniel
PostgreSQL-powered mail user agent and storage:
http://www.manitou-mail.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Johan Nel 2009-05-08 14:03:55 Re: Remote access
Previous Message A. Kretschmer 2009-05-08 13:59:54 Re: Remote access