Re: 7.3 schedule

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.3 schedule
Date: 2002-04-12 16:51:26
Message-ID: 27964.1018630286@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Certainly a shared cache would be good for apps that connect to issue a
> single query frequently. In such cases, there would be no local cache
> to use.

We have enough other problems with the single-query-per-connection
scenario that I see no reason to believe that a shared plan cache will
help materially. The correct answer for those folks will *always* be
to find a way to reuse the connection.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-12 17:28:34 pg_dump is broken in CVS tip
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-12 16:49:37 Re: 7.3 schedule