Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> writes:
> PL/Java will handle the RECORD type correctly. I'm just finalizing a new, more flexible,
> type mapping implementation for PL/Java and it would be easy to add support for more pseudo
> types too. But what others would make sense?
If you've got record/anyelement/anyarray support, you've probably pretty
much covered the bases.
Looking at the list (table 8-20), it strikes me that there's nothing
very pseudo about cstring anymore --- it could certainly be treated as
an ordinary datatype. Not sure if there's any point in changing though.
regards, tom lane