Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Date: 2013-12-06 03:25:53
Message-ID: 27951.1386300353@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> Two naming proposals, "ROWS FROM" and "TABLE FROM", got an ACK from more than
> one person apiece. I move that we settle on "ROWS FROM".

I'm not sufficiently annoyed by "ROWS FROM" to object. Other opinions?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-12-06 03:34:08 Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2013-12-06 03:16:38 Re: dblink performance regression