Re: Any better plan for this query?..

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Date: 2009-05-18 23:00:56
Message-ID: 2788.1242687656@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> In particular, running the tests repeatedly using
> H.REF_OBJECT = '0000000001'
> rather than varying the value seems likely to benefit MySQL.

... mumble ... query cache?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Carey 2009-05-19 00:51:19 Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Previous Message Dimitri 2009-05-18 22:33:07 Re: Any better plan for this query?..